#emc-devel | Logs for 2011-05-25

Back
[00:02:54] -!- The_Ball has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
[00:02:59] -!- pjm__ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[00:03:57] -!- theorbtwo has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
[00:04:00] theorb is now known as theorbtwo
[00:09:06] -!- Tom_itx has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
[00:11:30] -!- elmo40 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[00:21:39] -!- crazy_imp has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[00:26:09] -!- The_Ball has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
[00:26:11] -!- robh__ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[00:44:22] Techrat_CT is now known as Techrat
[00:46:53] -!- skunkworks [skunkworks!~chatzilla@str-bb-cable-south2-static-6-78.dsl.airstreamcomm.net] has joined #emc-devel
[01:11:09] -!- awallin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[01:13:51] Tom_shop is now known as Tom_itx
[01:25:59] <JT-Shop> SWPadnos: yep they are still there in 2.4, but there seems to be some kind of link problem in 2.4
[01:26:05] <JT-Shop> 2.5
[01:27:25] <JT-Shop> KimK: If I remember right if you move or delete or add a file do a make clean then a make
[01:32:15] -!- mozmck has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
[01:36:59] -!- scanf has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
[01:38:56] <KimK> JT-Shop: Thanks, I'll try that! And I might see if I can manage to annoy everybody on this step timing business too, I had a question about that. There are two(?) conflicting examples, maybe? So: If I set the base thread to 50,000ns (20kHz), should I expect a max of 20,000 steps/sec or 10,000 steps/sec? I was looking at the "step period high" and "step period low" on JT's forum diagram. It fits one example but not another.
[01:42:10] <JT-Shop> I think that depends on if your using the reset thingy which gives you 1 step per period vs 1 step per 2 periods or something like that
[01:44:25] <KimK> I'd like to make sure all our manual examples are correct. Or at least all wrong in the same way, lol! In the Integrator Manual, anyway, that's the last one I have to do, and I'm going through it now. The other manuals I've done already, and I'm willing to let them go, lol!
[01:45:55] <JT-Shop> what's the link to the forum diagram?
[01:46:38] <KimK> Plus it doesn't help that I'm a servo guy and have never used the built-in stepgen. Worked with steppers a little, but always with external hardware stepgens.
[01:47:15] <KimK> The forum link is the one you posted about 10-15 lines back.
[01:47:51] <JT-Shop> not my diagram
[01:48:09] <KimK> OK.
[01:48:35] <JT-Shop> I just posted the link as I had no clue as to what to answer :)
[01:49:24] <JT-Shop> I would think that the diagrams in the manuals are exactly correct for EMC :)
[01:50:38] <KimK> And I just re-posted the link because that's the first indication I've seen relative to the "full-speed" vs. "half-speed" business I was just mentioning relative to the examples in the manual.
[01:51:26] <KimK> I wondered if the base period was acting as a "clock" and therefore had to act twice to cycle the step.
[01:51:50] <KimK> Or does it only have to act once, I don't know.
[01:52:21] <JT-Shop> just depends on if you use the reset that resets the step after a time but before the period ends
[01:52:30] <KimK> Anyway, the inconsistent example bothered me when i went through them.
[01:52:40] <KimK> s/example/examples/
[01:53:07] <JT-Shop> before that it took two periods for each step, one for step and one for step space now it can be done in one period
[01:53:50] <JT-Shop> time for me to retire for the night
[01:54:41] <KimK> OK, great, thanks, that's the answer. "...now it can be done in one period". So I'll make the examples consistent with that. Goodnight, thanks for your help!
[01:55:41] <JT-Shop> it can still be done in two periods...
[01:56:00] <KimK> Is there a "default" selection?
[01:56:23] <JT-Shop> stepconf wizard gives you doublestep
[01:56:46] <KimK> Or if this is something that gets set in stepconf, maybe I'll have to show it both ways?
[01:57:16] <KimK> I don't want to confuse newcomers who are going through the examples like me.
[01:57:22] <JT-Shop> not sure if there is an advantage to not use doublestep
[01:58:09] <JT-Shop> yep, keep it as simple as you can for newbee's
[01:59:01] <KimK> Also, for all the talk of "steplen" and "dirhold" and such, I didn't see any step timing diagrams (like the forum diagram), at least not in the first 20% or so of the Integrator Manual (all I've done so far).
[02:03:32] -!- phreak_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[02:04:20] -!- skunkworks has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
[02:10:58] -!- atom1 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[02:25:07] -!- grommit has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86.1 [Firefox 4.0.1/20110413222027]]
[02:39:58] -!- toastyde1th has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[03:19:30] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@h081217056015.dyn.cm.kabsi.at] has joined #emc-devel
[03:41:23] -!- scanf has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
[03:42:27] <SWPadnos> KimK, it may be best to not change the stepping examples
[03:42:57] <SWPadnos> "doublestep" works, but it is only useful for stepper drives that need relatively short step pulses
[03:43:27] <SWPadnos> like under 5 uS or thereabouts
[03:44:07] <SWPadnos> the reason being that it will busy-wait during the step, so that the pin(s) can be reset at the end of the thread run
[03:45:05] <KimK> OK, but first, we may not be talking about the same examples. I'm only talking about a couple of brief calculations in the text where the numbers come out double or half. I don't want to change any lengthy presentations with graphics, etc.
[03:45:16] <SWPadnos> ok
[03:47:10] <KimK> I was just confused why in one spot it was double and one not, or vice-versa. I've fixed it in one spot by just mentioning both numbers, I think I can do the same in the other spot. That's it. I'll leave the explanations of why double or not to another chapter.
[03:47:20] <KimK> Is that OK?
[03:47:49] -!- ries has quit [Quit: ries]
[03:48:06] <SWPadnos> no idea. which part are you talking about? :)
[03:49:20] <KimK> I only have one for sure right now, hold on... Also minor storm front approaching in the event I get cut off.
[03:49:37] <SWPadnos> sleep approaching here, so no worries
[03:51:29] <KimK> From front of Integrator Manual: For example, if you are running a drive with a 20uS direction signal hold time requirement, and your latency test said you have a maximum latency of 11uS, then if you set the BASE_PERIOD to 20+11 = 31uS you get a not-so-nice 32,258 steps per second in one mode and 16,129 steps per second in another mode.
[03:51:36] -!- WalterN has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[03:52:09] <KimK> My change is I just mention both modes at the end of the line, so it better fits with the other example, which I don't have in front of me at the moment.
[03:52:33] <SWPadnos> ok, that probably makes sense
[03:52:49] <KimK> So that's OK then?
[03:53:18] <SWPadnos> note that at 10000 steps/inch, even the slower step rate is still ~100 IPM
[03:53:20] <SWPadnos> yep
[03:54:02] <KimK> OK. Didn't mean to scare the horses, lol.
[03:54:09] <SWPadnos> heh - yep
[03:54:32] <KimK> thanks, goodnight
[03:54:38] <SWPadnos> people are all over the top speed, but for the most common stepper machines, what sounds slow is still fast enough
[03:54:45] <SWPadnos> sure. thanks for working on docs :)
[03:55:35] <KimK> Accel/decel was what killed John's speed, not max step rate
[03:56:05] <SWPadnos> the person with the F200 rapids but only 75 IPM G1 moves?
[03:56:13] <KimK> No problem.
[03:56:28] <KimK> No, that must be somebody else.
[03:56:33] <SWPadnos> ok
[03:56:53] <SWPadnos> oh, John, the guy with the BP, who we see at the CNC workshops
[03:57:54] <KimK> Yes, he's moving a lot of mass there on that BP2 (he calls it a Bridgeport on steroids), so you can't change speeds very rapidly.
[03:59:39] <KimK> And since it's a knee mill, X is carried by Y, and X and Y are carried by Z, so things get slower and slower as you move up the axis list. Same motors and drivers on all axes.
[04:00:11] <SWPadnos> yep, got the same kind of machine here, only a series 1 (so lighter, but still stacked the same way)
[04:00:40] <SWPadnos> well, I guess I'll hit the sack. I can't remember if I need anything else from Mcmaster tonigth
[04:00:42] <KimK> Did you ever get your Hardinge going, I forgot?
[04:00:44] <SWPadnos> good night
[04:00:47] <SWPadnos> nope
[04:00:54] <SWPadnos> got rust though :(
[04:01:09] <KimK> OK, thanks, goodnight. (Good summer project!)
[04:18:51] -!- awallin [awallin!~quassel@cs27057046.pp.htv.fi] has joined #emc-devel
[04:37:44] Tech_Talk is now known as Birdman3131
[04:57:35] -!- Nick001 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
[05:01:03] -!- HazardX has quit [Quit: This computer has gone to sleep]
[05:20:10] -!- vladimirek [vladimirek!~vladimire@bband-dyn166.178-41-220.t-com.sk] has joined #emc-devel
[05:45:23] -!- ve7it has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[05:45:47] -!- psha [psha!~psha@195.135.238.205] has joined #emc-devel
[05:46:11] cjdavis1 is now known as cjdavis
[06:19:16] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[06:19:46] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@h081217056015.dyn.cm.kabsi.at] has joined #emc-devel
[06:23:28] -!- capricorn_one has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[06:35:25] -!- xcncx has quit [Client Quit]
[06:42:15] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[07:11:45] -!- KimK has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
[07:12:28] -!- KimK [KimK!~Kim__@ip174-71-95-176.om.om.cox.net] has joined #emc-devel
[07:13:58] -!- e-jones [e-jones!~jkastner@nat/redhat/x-tnrazafoasybpggv] has joined #emc-devel
[07:30:58] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@h081217056015.dyn.cm.kabsi.at] has joined #emc-devel
[07:51:41] -!- Dannyboy has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[07:55:59] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[08:06:24] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@h081217056015.dyn.cm.kabsi.at] has joined #emc-devel
[08:13:22] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[08:18:22] -!- scanf has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[08:23:47] -!- vladimirek has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[08:24:20] -!- vladimirek [vladimirek!~vladimire@bband-dyn166.178-41-220.t-com.sk] has joined #emc-devel
[08:24:45] -!- vladimirek has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[08:40:46] -!- robh__ [robh__!~robert@5ace7020.bb.sky.com] has joined #emc-devel
[09:43:11] -!- AC-130U has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[09:45:03] psha is now known as psha[work]
[09:49:05] -!- izua has quit [Read error: Operation timed out]
[11:05:30] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@extern-181.stiwoll.mah.priv.at] has joined #emc-devel
[11:16:16] -!- The_Ball has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[11:32:55] -!- cncbasher has quit [Client Quit]
[11:35:41] -!- elmo40 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[11:40:54] -!- ries has quit [Client Quit]
[11:46:53] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[11:49:01] -!- robh__ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[12:14:16] -!- mozmck [mozmck!~moses@client-173.225.233.241.dfwtx.partnershipbroadband.com] has joined #emc-devel
[12:26:44] -!- psha[work] has quit [Quit: leaving]
[12:31:29] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@extern-181.stiwoll.mah.priv.at] has joined #emc-devel
[12:37:08] -!- skunkworks [skunkworks!447329d2@gateway/web/freenode/ip.68.115.41.210] has joined #emc-devel
[13:24:16] -!- JT-Shop has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[13:25:09] -!- JT-Shop [JT-Shop!~chatzilla@216-41-156-49.semo.net] has joined #emc-devel
[13:25:27] -!- Userli has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
[13:28:17] -!- factor has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[13:44:49] -!- factor has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[13:52:26] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[13:53:04] -!- nullie has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
[14:10:46] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@extern-181.stiwoll.mah.priv.at] has joined #emc-devel
[14:12:01] -!- Valen has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[14:37:20] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[15:01:15] -!- mhaberler [mhaberler!~mhaberler@extern-181.stiwoll.mah.priv.at] has joined #emc-devel
[15:01:59] -!- Nick001 has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[15:07:42] -!- tom3p [tom3p!~tomp@74.93.88.241] has joined #emc-devel
[15:43:41] -!- Userli has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
[15:58:13] -!- JT-Shop has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[15:58:27] -!- e-jones has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
[15:58:43] -!- JT-Shop [JT-Shop!~chatzilla@216-41-156-49.semo.net] has joined #emc-devel
[16:04:53] -!- Connor has quit [Read error: No route to host]
[16:05:33] -!- Connor [Connor!~Connor@75.76.30.113] has joined #emc-devel
[16:11:25] -!- Al_Smt has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[16:14:05] -!- psha [psha!~psha@213.208.162.69] has joined #emc-devel
[16:15:22] -!- cncbasher has quit [Quit: Visitor from www.linuxcnc.org]
[16:32:43] -!- ve7it [ve7it!~LawrenceG@S0106009027972e37.pk.shawcable.net] has joined #emc-devel
[16:44:51] -!- landau has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[17:29:40] -!- mrsunshine_ has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
[17:48:35] -!- awallin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[18:18:40] -!- IchGuckLive has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86 [Firefox 3.6.3/20100423140709]]
[18:27:56] Tom_itx is now known as brainwave
[18:28:11] brainwave is now known as Tom_itx
[18:32:24] -!- isssy has quit [Quit: Visitor from www.linuxcnc.org]
[18:51:13] -!- nullie has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
[18:54:19] -!- grommit has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[19:09:42] -!- andypugh [andypugh!~andy2@cpc2-basl1-0-0-cust1037.basl.cable.virginmedia.com] has joined #emc-devel
[19:12:08] -!- Loetmichel has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
[19:13:50] -!- acemi has quit [Quit: WeeChat 0.3.2]
[19:15:09] -!- Techrat has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[19:29:13] -!- tom3p has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
[19:42:35] -!- psha has quit [Quit: leaving]
[19:48:30] -!- micges has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[19:54:17] -!- mhaberler has quit [Quit: mhaberler]
[20:28:39] -!- micges [micges!~ddd@cer104.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl] has joined #emc-devel
[20:58:25] -!- FinboySlick has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[21:15:56] -!- jthornton has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[21:17:02] -!- JT-Shop has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[21:18:36] -!- skunkworks has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
[21:24:41] -!- seb_kuzminsky [seb_kuzminsky!~seb@69.25.99.254] has joined #emc-devel
[21:41:54] -!- phreak_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[21:51:32] -!- jthornton [jthornton!~chatzilla@216-41-156-49.semo.net] has joined #emc-devel
[21:51:34] -!- isssy has quit [Quit: Visitor from www.linuxcnc.org]
[21:52:19] -!- acemi has quit [Quit: WeeChat 0.3.2]
[21:52:46] -!- syyl has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[21:52:59] -!- Fox_Muldr has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[22:12:34] -!- ve7it has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[22:15:29] -!- skunkworks [skunkworks!~chatzilla@str-bb-cable-south2-static-6-78.dsl.airstreamcomm.net] has joined #emc-devel
[22:21:26] -!- ve7it [ve7it!~LawrenceG@S0106009027972e37.pk.shawcable.net] has joined #emc-devel
[22:25:10] -!- andypugh has quit [Quit: andypugh]
[22:36:55] -!- JT-Shop [JT-Shop!~chatzilla@216-41-156-49.semo.net] has joined #emc-devel
[22:43:57] -!- seb_kuzminsky has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[23:25:55] -!- micges has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
[23:50:32] -!- Valen has quit [Quit: Leaving.]