#emc-devel | Logs for 2010-07-12

Back
[02:31:29] <cradek> hey I bet nobody has ever noticed this before! if you have subroutines in the program, rfl does some random surprising thing.
[02:32:08] <cradek> (worked great like always once I unrolled the gcode)
[06:20:50] <ries_> ries_ is now known as ries
[11:52:49] <CIA-2> EMC: 03jthornton 07v2.4_branch * r113cf18b35e7 10/docs/src/hal/drivers.lyx: add a bit of info on using stepgen doublefreq
[12:20:34] <jepler> cradek: your deadpan humor is too much for me. RFL an o-words, oh my.
[13:46:26] <micges_work1> cradek: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2561963&group_id=6744&atid=106744
[13:49:40] <cradek> I was trying to be funny by saying it that way - I knew the problem had been encountered and reported before.
[13:55:40] <micges_work1> I see
[19:48:06] <CIA-2> EMC: 03cradek 07master * r7034c8c5c755 10/src/emc/task/emctaskmain.cc: Fix RFL when starting between a sub definition and its call
[19:50:01] <cradek> jepler: ^ possible backport candidate
[19:51:19] <skunkworks> cradek: nice!
[19:51:37] <SWPadnos> indeed
[19:51:54] <cradek> meh - test it before you say that
[19:52:37] <cradek> worked on micges's test program anyway
[19:52:55] <cradek> the bar is pretty low, considering how badly it's been broken all along :-)
[19:55:01] <skunkworks> heh
[19:55:05] <micges> cradek: you added } in commit
[19:55:47] <cradek> oh dangit
[19:56:22] <cradek> I used git gui to make that bogus commit (still built for me, because I had the other { in my file, not committed)
[19:58:03] <micges> you didn't look at git diff
[19:58:23] <cradek> I actually did, but I didn't see it as an error.
[19:58:45] <micges> weird
[19:58:59] <cradek> fix coming
[19:59:24] <CIA-2> EMC: 03cradek 07master * r856d4904c87c 10/src/emc/task/emctaskmain.cc: fix bogus previous commit
[19:59:27] <cradek> now the buildbot will punish me :-)
[20:09:01] <Jymmm> cradek: but you'll like it.
[20:11:00] <Jymmm> cradek: =)
[20:32:44] <cradek> BUILD FAILED: failed
[20:32:51] <cradek> I think it failed. Does anyone else notice that it failed?
[20:35:49] <SWPadnos> Failed to retrieve build failure status
[20:39:21] <cradek> this calls for fuzzy kitten: http://timeguy.com/cradek-files/fuzzy-kitten.jpg
[20:40:25] <Jymmm> cradek: I'm thinking sobriety is more in order
[20:40:25] <SWPadnos> he's just too fast!
[20:40:53] <cradek> I tried about four times - that's the sharpest one.
[20:41:20] <Jymmm> cradek: You sure you were sober at the time? Not seeing fuzzy?
[20:41:35] <cradek> Jymmm: you know how I get
[20:41:55] <Jymmm> * Jymmm sends cradek off to CNCAA (again)
[20:45:29] <skunkworks> what about http://imagebin.ca/img/UCvBhZa.jpg
[20:45:55] <cradek> that's a much bigger model
[20:46:29] <cradek> when they get bigger, they're easy to photograph because they actually hold still
[20:46:51] <cradek> (I like old cats best!)
[20:47:19] <skunkworks> heh
[20:47:37] <skunkworks> they are great napping partners
[20:50:57] <skunkworks> I think this is where bill watterson got the idea http://imagebin.ca/img/tY0uyUHO.jpg